home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- September 1991
-
-
- THE KENTUCKY STATE POLICE DRUG TESTING POLICY
-
- By
-
- W. Michael Troop
- Acting Kentucky State Police Commissioner
- Secretary of Justice
- and
- Jerry Lovitt
- Major
- Commander, Operations Division (East Branch)
- Kentucky State Police
-
-
- Today, it is no longer enough for a law enforcement agency
- to claim that it is drug free; it must prove it. To this end,
- the Kentucky State Police developed and implemented an employee
- drug testing policy. This policy is an enhanced version of the
- Kentucky State Government's policies that will help to promote
- further the concept, and hopefully, the reality of a drug-free
- workplace.
-
- CREATING THE POLICY
-
- Department administrators set out to make the drug testing
- policy a product of employees. To begin, they appointed
- representatives from the Trooper Advisory Panel and the Civilian
- Advisory Panel, whose members are elected by sworn and civilian
- employees respectively, to a Drug Testing Advisory Committee.
- Then, employees from other areas of the agency, such as data
- processing, the laboratory, personnel, and the Legal Office,
- were also appointed to the committee. A Branch Commander from
- the Operations Division headed the 16-member committee. After 4
- months of research and planning, the committee formulated a drug
- testing policy that was fair, workable, and one that ensured
- employee privacy, integrity, and dignity throughout the testing
- process.
-
- The committee also developed a 20-page booklet to
- communicate the key points of the drug policy to the employees.
- And, prior to implementing the policy, a staff officer visited
- each of the Kentucky State Police's 16 posts to present the
- program to the employees and to address their questions and
- concerns. Additionally, post and section commanders received
- training in the drug testing program procedures.
-
- THE DRUG TESTING PROCESS
-
- Random Drug Testing
-
- As of January 1, 1991, all sworn employees hired since
- 1984, when drug testing of job applicants began, and all
- aircraft support personnel became subject to random drug
- testing. Employees hired prior to 1984 are also subject to
- random drug testing. Random drug testing of civilian employees
- in certain safety-sensitive classifications, such as arson
- investigations, communications, the forensic laboratory, and in
- the armed facilities security section, will also become
- mandatory in 1991. However, before an agency employee can be
- randomly tested, written authorization is obtained on a
- voluntary consent form. This form stipulates that the employee
- agrees to be drug tested no less than once and no more than
- twice over a 2-year period.
-
- Specific Selection Drug Testing
-
- In addition to a random drug testing policy, the committee
- also set a specific selection drug testing policy. Under this
- policy, drug testing is mandatory for the following groups of
- employees:
-
- * All sworn employee applicants
-
- * Employees eligible for promotion
-
- * Employees transferring into aircraft support
-
- * Drug enforcement/special investigations staff members
-
- * Special response team members and/or those involved in
- drug interdiction work.
-
- Drug testing is also required for any sworn employee upon
- documented, reasonable suspicion of illegal drug use. If an
- employee refuses to be tested for possible drug use, they are
- then subject to disciplinary action. In addition, should an
- employee be involved in an accident or critical incident, drug
- testing is available upon request.
-
- The Drug Test
-
- Every Monday, the post and section commanders coordinate
- the matching of employee names to individual identification
- numbers--not Social Security numbers. Only those employees
- subject to and available for random drug testing during a
- particular week are assigned identification numbers. Then, the
- identification numbers only are forwarded to the agency's
- personnel branch for entry into a computer system. The computer
- randomly selects a subset of the entered identification numbers,
- and any employee whose identification number matches one of the
- numbers that the computer selects will be drug tested within 5
- working days. The selected employees post or section commanders
- withholds notification of testing until the day of the test so
- that drug testing is not compromised and that it occurs in a
- timely and efficient manner.
-
- Drug testing is performed through urinalysis. Only
- Kentucky State Police Forensic Laboratory personnel and post or
- section commanders are authorized to administer the drug tests.
- At the time of the test, each employee is asked to complete a
- more-detailed voluntary consent form. This enhanced consent
- form: 1) Requests employee permission for a urine specimen to
- be collected and tested; 2) describes the list of drugs for
- which the specimen will be tested; 3) describes how the test
- results will be used and to whom they may be communicated; 4)
- delineates possible agency action if the test is positive; and
- 5) informs the employee of the consequences of violating any
- testing procedure. The form also requests a list of any
- medication the employee has taken over the last 15 days.
-
- The employee is then handed a sealed, plastic specimen
- container with a built-in thermometer. The employee provides
- the urine specimen in a secured, private restroom. In the
- interest of employee privacy, there are no witnesses, and
- disrobing is not required. When the employee returns the filled
- specimen container to the drug testing personnel, it is
- immediately checked for temperature to ensure that the employee
- has provided an authentic sample. Next, in the presence of the
- employee, the specimen is divided into two containers. One of
- the samples is held as a control sample in case an employee
- would wish to verify positive results later with a laboratory of
- their choosing.
-
- Drug testing personnel then explain the chain-of-custody
- form to the employee. Once the employee verifies the
- information on this form, drug testing personnel seal the
- specimen containers with lids and with tamper-proof sealing
- tape. A label that identifies the specimens only by employee
- identification number is affixed to each container. The
- employee, after verifying that the identification number on the
- specimen containers matches the identification number on the
- list held by the post or section commander, signs off on this
- list. Afterward, drug testing personnel forward the
- chain-of-custody form and the specimen containers to the
- Kentucky State Police Forensic Laboratory.
-
- At the laboratory, each employee's specimen is checked for
- possible tampering, logged in, and processed. A test tube
- sample is also drawn from an original specimen and stored for
- future testing, if needed. Several test tube samples are
- batched together, of which approximately 20 percent will be
- control samples for quality assurance checks.
-
- Analysis
-
- Immunoassay tests are used to screen the samples. These
- tests serve to identify substances, such as proteins, through
- their ability to stimulate physical responses from the body's
- immune system. Each specimen is screened for marijuana,
- cocaine, opiates, amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepine,
- and propoxyphene. It is also checked for the presence of other
- elements to ensure the authenticity of the urine specimen.
-
- The drug detection levels set in the agency's drug testing
- policy are as follows:
-
- * Marijuana--50 ng/ml
-
- * Cocaine--300 ng/ml
-
- * Opiates--300 ng/ml
-
- * Amphetamines--300 ng/ml
-
- * Benzodiazepine--300 ng/ml
-
- * Propoxyphene--300 ng/ml
-
- If the first screening of a particular specimen is positive,
- a more-complex and expensive chemical analysis, such as gas
- chromatography or mass spectrometry, is performed to confirm the
- initial results of the immunoassay screening. If this test is
- positive, the specimen is sent to an independent laboratory for
- further analysis. A second positive confirmation will trigger
- administrative and/or disciplinary action against the tested
- employee.
-
- Agency Response to Positive Test Results
-
- All test results are sent directly to the Kentucky State
- Police's Employee Assistance Program--the only place where an
- identification number can be correlated to an employee's name.
- From this point, a medical review officer, who is a physician
- employed on a contract basis, meets privately with the employee
- whose test results indicate unsanctioned drug use.
-
- If the medical review officer finds no legal reason for the
- positive test results, the physician notifies the Employee
- Assistance Program. The Employee Assistance Program then
- notifies the Internal Affairs Section, if the results concern a
- sworn employee, or the Legal Office, if the results concern a
- civilian employee. Internal Affairs or the Legal Office will
- then contact the employee. The commissioner, who is empowered
- to authorize an immediate nondisciplinary administrative leave
- for the employee in question, is also informed of
- "presumptive" positive test results.
-
- Any employee found to be involved in illegal drug use faces
- disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal. However,
- for prescription drug misuse, the agency's emphasis is on
- employee rehabilitation only. All employees, regardless of the
- type of drug use violation, are required to make themselves
- available to the Employee Assistance Program if referred to the
- program by a supervisor. Employees may also be required to
- complete satisfactorily a drug abuse assistance or treatment
- program as a condition of continued employment.
-
- In an effort to direct employees to the best available drug
- abuse assistance or treatment programs, the Employee Assistance
- Program maintains an updated list of drug abuse treatment
- facilities nationwide.
-
- CONCLUSION
-
- The Kentucky State Police's drug testing policy is a
- product of its employees. It provides what is believed to be a
- total approach to the substance abuse issue, of which drug
- testing is but one component. The policy also emphasizes
- employee awareness/education programs; supervisor/manager
- training; prohibitions against the use, sale, possession or
- manufacture of illegal drugs; specific guidelines about the
- misuse of alcohol and prescription drugs; employee and family
- counseling through the Employee Assistance Program; and support
- for long-term rehabilitation. As of February 1991, 98% of all
- sworn employees have voluntarily submitted to drug testing. As
- a whole, 84.4% of both sworn and civilian personnel within the
- Kentucky State Police have been tested.
-
- It is the Kentucky State Police's belief that the general
- public has a right to expect a stricter accounting of law
- enforcement employees concerning possible illegal drug use than
- would routinely be expected of most government employees. Drug
- testing of law enforcement employees is a small step to take
- toward meeting that expectation. A law enforcement agency could
- not deliver a stronger message to the public it serves.